Eu ia dizer isso, na cidade onde moro h� muito d�ficit de m�o de obra em postos de trabalhos que ningu�m quer... pedreiro, repositor e caixa de mercado, limpeza e servi�os gerais, etc...
Recebemos muitos imigrantes Haitianos e tamb�m alguns venezuelanos que vieram pra c� nos �ltimos meses, essas pessoas conseguem se comunicar bem, s�o amistosas, empolgadas e prontas pra qualquer trampo e vou te dizer... conheci alguns que tem muito mais higiene/cuidados do que muitos brasileiros, ent�o n�o acho que eles sobrecarregaram a j� ca�tica sa�de publica brasileira.

Problema maior foi pros professores, muitas crian�as entrando e tendo bastante dificuldade para acompanhar os demais, meu cunhado � professor e j� me falou de v�rios perrengues que passou um tempo atr�s na alta da imigra��o haitiana. por�m no mais, foi at� tranquilo.
Os costumes tmab�m mudam, j� vi coisas "esquisitas" na quest�o religiosa, mas sempre me afastei para n�o julgar mau, mas � estranho  

Opa, boas campanhas surgindo com v�rias particularidades em poucos dias.... n�o gambling, sem exig�ncia de post m�nimos em abas locais, campanhas de cassinos fortes (aue tentem a ser duradouras/semieternas) s� falta aumentar o pagamento.

De todo o tipo de campanha, eu acho que o melhor modelo � esse igual ao da Duelbits que paga por posts, ou seja... n�o existe uma quantidade m�nima de postagens por semana a ser cumprida, ent�o voc� nunca vai perder uma semana porque um t�pico foi apagado/movido e voc� perdeu postagens ou porque deu algum problema pessoal para cumprir a meta.

Enfim, tor�o para que mais campanhas n�o gambling surjam, acho que esse tipo de "empreendimento" vai demorar � secar, por�m n�o vai durar pra sempre. Quando o gambling sumir oque ir� sobrar?

Well, I think it depends of the game....
In the case of roulette, dice and others like tihs., there is no way to lose forever, these people will always have some winnings occasionally even if in the long run they always lose money. So at this case there is not much to do other than manage the bankroll. I'm someone who managed my bankroll well, at least in these types of games I bet a maximum of 5% on each bet, but if the person does not know how to manage their bankroll and spends all their money in a few rounds, then they definitely stop and should not play anymore.

But, there are also sports games and here is no secret... the person really needs to study the sport and need to love them, follow the news, research a lot and only bet after they are convinced of the game is results. If the person keeps losing, then they are betting on the wrong sport and then YES, they need to stop immediately or find another sport that they can follow more closely and study before betting.

I am sorry, but I need to disagree with you because i think that someone who play just to relax or have fun has an increased chance of making gaming their primary way of dealing with emotions, but that alone would never automatically make someone an addict. I think an addicted person is someone who has completely lost control of what they are doing.... sometimes they have not realized it yet, but just the fact that they enjoy something and do it occasionally or in a controlled way is not a reason to call them addicted, do you not you think?

I agree with you when you say that our brain "marks" what gives us pleasure and makes us always return to it, repeating that good impulse, and that is where addiction can take hold. But there are many people who manage to control these impulses and not let them dominate their lives... these are the controlled people, the sensible people, those who recognize the problem and are not addicted.

That is true, and I think here.... do you know why people try to recover your losses? I see three big problems and these people probably have some of them:

Loss aversion is the first and i Think the most common... sometimes lose $100 is very painful, worse than winning that amount, losing and still breaking even. That is why our brain does not want to "end the day" with that pain, with this loss. So, "he are forced" to keep playing to break even and balance the loss.

The other is the dedication to time spended... If more time and money you put into a session, harder it is to accept that it is over. Think about it with me... if you play for 10min and lose everything, that is fine , but if you play for all day and lose everything on the last hour, this does not that have a greater impact? Like, you played all day and it was all in vain? That is to hard to accept.

The last one is the illusion of control... there is the player who believes they understand the game and have mastered it after many rounds and has the "confidence" that they will be able to reverse the situation even knowing that the result is totally random.

In short, I thought of these three.
The game is treacherous for those who do not have good bankroll management and strong emotions to control their impulses.

Ser�!? Concordo que o mundo hoje est� cada vez mais polarizado entre EUA e China, mas acho que essa sua afirma��o de "escolher um lado" � meio for�ada, desculpe.
N�o critico os EUA pelo fato, apesar de n�o concordar com os reais motivos que motivaram eles a invadir a Venezuela e capturar Maduro (quest�o econ�mica) mas mesmo que fosse criticar os EUA n�o acho que isso automaticamente signifique preferir a China.

Claro, tem o fato de v�rios pa�ses estarem se juntando em um lado, e o fato do Brasil estar indo pra junta da China � preocupante... mas nesse momento na quest�o econ�mica acho que seria o melhor lado, o problema � as a��es e declara��es que esses "aliados econ�micos" da China est�o dando contra o outro lado, mas acho eu (a n�o ser que eu esteja muito ignorante) que n�o ter� lado A ou B, em todas as �reas, n�o s� economias, v�rios pa�ses ter�o que continuar se relacionando e cooperando. � s� esperar pelo pr�ximo capitulo e tudo muda de novo... cada um vai pelo que � mais vantajoso economicamente e nesse momento (j� vindo de v�rios anos) a China t� surgindo como uma grande pedra no sapato dos EUA... a China n�o � mais o pa�s que "come cachorrinho", a china � uma potencia econ�mica, o termo "produto da china" no sentido pejorativo, deixou de fazer sentido a muito tempo.

O m�todo politico deles preocupa? sim.... mas n�o acho que vai polarizar assim n�o, no momento o Brasil t� fazendo boas rela��es comerciais l�, o Brasil s� precisa tomar cuidado como fala as coisas e os posicionamento que toma.

Pronto, olha onde chegamos com essa discuss�o.
@Adriano, por favor bloqueia o t�pico, se eu soubesse que a sugest�o de um Mr(s) fosse chegar a esse ponto eu nem teria come�ado, daqui a pouco estaremos usando TODES tamb�m
A Mindy j� agradeceu quem queria, agora tranca o t�pico

Mas eu compreendi, esse fato do Sr. Member ser um t�tulo para Senior Member � algo que eu como Legendary n�o sabia, olha s� que ignor�ncia a minha no ingl�s apesar de saber mas n�o ligar os fatos. Se bem que poderiam ter utilizado tamb�m "Snr" n� pra n�o causar confus�o.


N�o vai pegar, nem mesmo na aba local... pessoas aqui s�o mais inteligentes e racionais do que o publico brasileiro em geral.

Well, it depends....
I've played at casinos that claimed to have 24/7 support, but it took them at least 24 hours to give the first response. Does that help much? No... so don't fall for the illusion that a 24/7 casino is that important. I mean... it is important, yes, but it's not the only thing you need to consider.

Something I always look for in the terms of service or in the FAQs... somewhere, is the response time they have to resolve a problem. There are things you can wait for, but there are others that would certainly make me never go back to the casino if I have problems with withdrawals, deposits, or KYC. Why? Because these are situations that would completely trap my money and I would not be able to play. Is there anything worse than that? Them withholding your money and preventing you from having fun?

So, 24/7 is important, but resolution time is too. I always analyze both.

I am Luck to never experienced anything like this and I think it is because I keep my gambling habits all time in private... not even my closest family members know that I gamble... So, I think this trap is quite common: to someone who is confident in something and wants "help" to increase bet just because they feel certain of the outcome.
You know what the problem with that is??? Even if you win, it will haunt you more and more, so it's best to get out of it before even the first bet.

I do not know... but i think  thatsome people share this with others because they so enthusiasted that they need to witness their stroke of luck to someone, or so they don't feel so lonely if they lose.

I someone that prefer place my own bets, in peace and with my own planning... a defined bankroll... a fixed amount per bet... and no impulsive stake increases... especialy if someone tells me to do. I've never let anyone interfere with my bets... I think if it is my money, so I accept advice but the final decision is only mine

That is all marketing hype... the most common terms are "no KYC" or "full anonymity", but I confess that the label is quite vague and more about advertising than technical aspects, so I think you should not worry too much about it and try to interpret it as it is written.

What I see casinos doing most is using terms like "anonymous" or "instant online casino" in some banners and even signatures here on the forum to indicate that they prioritize anonymity, accept cryptocurrencies as a form of deposit, and will never require KYC verification. This is all to attract players who are fed up with the numerous requirements of regulated platforms and who are more concerned about privacy nowadays.

But, going back to your question... regardless of how they describe it, the focus is always on prioritizing player anonymity, from requiring a minimum registration, without KYC requirements and obviously accepting only cryptocurrencies for deposits.